Healthcare Economist April 12, 2021
Jason Shafrin

If you want to implement value-based care, you need to define what a ‘good’ outcome is. A good outcome may be different for different individuals. For instance, if you look at mortality rates for a given disease, it makes sense that individuals age 80 and above will have higher mortality rates than those 20-29 year old with the identical condition. If you are measuring physician or hospital quality, you will want to control–or “risk-adjust”–for these differences in patient characteristics. Traditionally, risk adjustment controls for patient demographics and medical conditions. However, should you control for social factors such as poverty or education? There is a lot of debate:

The current policy of the National Quality Forum (NQF) allows adjustment for...

Today's Sponsors

Teladoc Health
Premier
TripleTree

Today's Sponsors

SalesSparx
Canton & Company

Today's Sponsor

HLTH

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Payment Models, Provider, SDOH, Value Based
The Urgent Need for Innovations in Care Delivery
Association Between Adherence, Social Predictors Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees
The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Health Equity and Their Root Causes
Social Risk Adjustment Promotes Health Equity In Value Based Care
Implications of COVID-19 for Social Determinants of Health